Finally—after weeks of surreal teasers and yesterday’s opening-credits reveal, which actually revealed nothing—we have a real trailer for American Horror Story.
Case Against Judaism—Chronological Exhibits & Interpretations & articles— from www. Back to Top. Cans of Worms: Discovering the True Past. How Historical Revisionism Progresses. Specifically Jewish Revisionisms: 1 David Bryant. This is a link to David Bryant's piece on Jewish corruption of the USA, Europe, and Russia since about 1. David Bryant on Jews. David Bryant ('The Birdman') put together and discovered many historical events; but, inevitably, a lot has escaped him—life is short.
Read him and notice among other things.. Bryant hasn't understood that Jewish influence pre- dates 1. US Civil War, Jews and the Atlantic slave trade, and Jews and the French Revolution. Bryant thinks nuclear weapons were genuine, and that Jewish 'atom spies' sent genuine secrets to the U.
S. S. R. Part of this site shows reasonably conclusively that nuclear weapons were a fraud, and the 'atom spies' were, too. Bryant assumes the Korean War and Vietnam War had genuine military purposes; is this true? Maybe they were simply to make money for Jews. Bryant assumes Nobel Prizes prove Jewish creativity, despite the warning fact that these 'prizes' are heavily promoted in the Jewish media.
In fact, many of them are for phoney work. Perhaps I should update this word, since telephones have been technologically outpaced by digital transmissions. How about 'didgy' as a new version of 'phoney'?). However, Bryant was one of the few to work on the probable murder of James Forrestal, Secretary of the US Navy, by Jews. Specifically Jewish Revisionisms: 2 Intermittent Progress from about 1.
Briefly, let's look in date order at. Bertrand Russell's death. Did Six Million Really Die? Richard Verrall. 1. Treason at Westminster - Kitty Little.
World Coup d'État Planned - Kitty Little. Spycatcher - Peter Wright. The Longest Hatred - Jane Birdwood. Mammon vs God - Kitty Little. What I'm looking for here is the realisation that Jews backed by fiat money power gained control of many countries and manipulated them, in what they thought were their own ends. Bertrand Russell opposed British and, later, American intervention in the First World War.
However, he never doubted that the Second World War was admirable and just. He later opposed nuclear weapons, having no idea of their likely Jewish fraudulence. He had no idea Cuba may have been a marrano Jewish construct, nor did he see any connection between JFK's murder and Jews. He came to oppose what he saw as American war crimes, notably in Vietnam, which were covered up by Jewish interests: he considered the USA was building up a world empire.
He became part of the Jewish process of pretending racial differences aren't significant, though I doubt he had much grasp of that policy. Richard Verrall (perhaps with other author(s) took on the 'Holocaust' myth, which had been put in place by Jewish media in the thirty years since 1. He also perceived the link with immigration into white countries and anti- white and anti- national views.
Kitty Little's. Treason at Westminster I think supported the Second World War on what she thought were patriotic grounds. However, she thought the Soviet Union was trying to build a world empire: she was not aware of specifically Jewish plans, for example in Africa. She has details on reducing of British power, by the Labour Party, by damage to industry, finance, military strength, and so on, and assorted laws and agreements, including weakening treason legislation, but with no specific Jewish background information. She noted the use of deliberate immigration as a ploy to damage Britain, and the related anti- white propaganda. Her work is based on Britain (though much the same might have been said of many countries). She is aware of fifth column activity, but doesn't have a theory of what should be done where a hostile elite or layer pursues policies opposite to the general population. She had a science background, and was something of a whistleblower, for example against 'the pill', and diesel engines, but had no insight into nuclear matters.
Kitty Little's World Coup d'État contains Christian materials. She discusses 'Communism' with little emphasis on its Jewishness. She extends into the UNO, and the European Community, which she notes correctly is a Soviet- style undemocratic construction. Peter Wright's Spycatcher shows an honest but slightly naive man, fully believing in the justice of the Second World \War, but puzzling over links with the USSR; he believed the Cold War was as presented in the Jewish media, and was baffled at the links with the 'Russians'. In retrospect most of the big frauds were helped by supposed 'defecting spies' with sensational stories: atom spies, Cuban missile spies, up to Vanunu.
There's an account of Roger Hollis, the head of MI5, laughing as Wright explained laboriously what evidence he had for Hollis' leaks. Lady Birdwood in. The Longest Hatred pieced together Jewish fiat money, including the 'Federal reserve', and included material on coloured immigration.
She included the Talmud, Freemasons, and wars, notably Iraq. She still mentions Churchill positively, but recognises the 'Holocaust' as a fraud, fortified by Fred Leuchter, and names Jews in Britain as behind race laws and other manipulations. She doesn't mention depressions, strangling of money supplies, buying up profitable businesses, and war profits, or at least not very clearly. She even included Jewish mal- education.
However she was not much good on science frauds. Kitty Little's Mammon vs God follows Birdwood in identifying usury (not I think defined as e. Jewish central banks) and the New World Order as a secret policy. Note that H G Wells wanted world government; but not run by a clique of Jews. Kitty Little is more nationalistic, though she liked the British Commonwealth and its co- operation. She has a very Christian outlook and goes so far as to take Biblical accounts of races as genuine history.
She notices the use of 'war crimes' as a pretext - i. Jews are accused of, though she doesn't extend this back to Vietnam, or further back to Korea, or to the Second World War. And she notices the use of law to damage whites and benefit immigrants; and the equivalent internationally, using deceit, psychological operations, and what are often called 'false flags'.
She notes the Jewish attacks on Christianity. This is just a very brief survey of just a few sources, but they help show that disentangling truth in the teeth of propaganda and violence is not a simple process. Revisionist Processes: 1 New Information and Ideas.
Obviously, revisionism needs new information. Let's take some examples: NASA's moon fraud goes back many years; peoples' awakening has been variable, and of course there are people—pop musicians, journalists etc—who haven't woken up; ditto the 'Holocaust', ditto blacks and Jews. It's obvious that attitudes to science, to Jews, to politicians, will change; and blacks' attitudes to whites as opposed to Jewish slave- owners in the past, will change. Another example is nuclear weapons considered as a fraud; this is the newest topic known to me, post- dating even 9/1. As with a detective story, new information leads to new guesses. For example, covert murders by Jews will be much more likely to be explored in future.
Revisionist Processes: 2 Back Through Time. Along with the expansion of ideas in the present, thoughtful people will look back.
The entire disaster of the 2. US Civil War, for example, the Opium Wars. And earlier—Cromwell, and events after the Civil War, which probably have parallels with BBC and other propaganda in Britain after the Second World War, providing useful reference points for comparison; and the Reformation which must have parallels with revisionist awakenings now, for example discovery of frauds (the 'Donation of Constantine' and the 'Holocaust', as examples).
In fact the whole of history is up for intellectual grabs: Spain and the Inquisition—is it true that Jews regard Muslims as a large dim population, and are happy to live exploiting them?
This Fan Art of Rick and Morty's Vindicators Is So Good It Hurts to Look At. Yeah, yeah, Rick Sanchez is great and so is Morty and that joke you just made about Mc. Donald’s Szechuan sauce was incredibly clever, but I need you to be quiet for a second and look at this art of the Vindicators. I mean really look at it. Drink it in. Savor it.
Bask in its glory. We here at io. 9 feel very confidently that the Vindicators, Rick and Morty’s cosmos- hopping team of dysfunctional superheroes, are more than deserving of their very own series chronicling their own adventures. Divx Ipod Adam And Dog. As if this past week’s episode featuring Supernova, Million Ants, Maximus Renegade Star Soldier, Alan Rails, Crocubot, and Noob- Noob wasn’t already enough to convince you, artist Stephen Byrne’s glorious illustration of the squad, rendered in full the comic book stylized glory that they deserve, sure as hell should. Even if it omits Noob- Noob.)Sure, most of the Vindicators are currently dead in Rick and Morty’s prime universe, but that shouldn’t be a reason to count them all out quite yet.
The multiverse is an awfully large place that Rick, Morty, and Summer couldn’t possibly hope to patrol and protect (?) all on their own. No, at some point, they’re probably going to need the help of a half- crocodile, half- robot monster thingy and his good buddy, a sentient ant colony. Trust us, the time will come when the only person who can save all of existence is actually a squirming pile of ants shaped like a man.